Technically, Women’s
History Month was created to pay tribute to the generations of women whose
commitment to nature and the planet
have proved invaluable to society. But I think the celebration should also salute women who are advocates of Women’s Rights.
Equal Rights
Amendment: “Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or
abridged by the United States or any State on account of sex” – these words are
the heart of the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA). In 1923, Alice Paul, a women’s rights activist whose suffragist campaign
culminated in passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, wrote the ERA. Congress passed the amendment in 1972 and
sent it on to the states for ratification. In 1982, it came closest to being
ratified when thirty-five of the thirty-eight states required for inclusion in
the Constitution passed it. The amendment has been reintroduced into (and
defeated by) every Congress since then. In the 113th Congress (2013 –
2015), the ERA was reintroduced as H.J. Res 56 by Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), who continues to call for the
prohibition of “denying or abridging equal rights under law by the United
States or any State on account of sex” as it was originally proposed in 1923.
Equal Pay Act: On
June 10, 1963, President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act, as part of the Fair
Labor Standards Act, into law. The EPA
“prohibits sex-based wage discrimination between men and women in the same
establishment who perform jobs that require substantially equal skill, effort
and responsibility under similar working conditions.” Administered and
enforced by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the EPA
attempts to fulfill the aspiration of equal pay for equal work and reduce the
gender pay gap.
Notwithstanding the EPA,
in 2013, the gender pay gap (unadjusted), or “a measure of unequal pay for
women compared to men,” is still prevalent and persistent in the U.S. When the
EPA was signed in 1963, women earned on average 59% of what men were paid –
that is, 59 cents for every dollar men made. Fast forward 50 years: women earn on average 77% of what men are paid,
or 77 cents for every dollar men make. That
is an increase of less than 4 cents per decade. A recent analysis by the Institute for
Women’s Policy Research on the trajectory of the gender pay gap from 1960-2012
is an excellent illustration of how progress in shrinking the gap has stalled
since 2002. While many blatantly sexist discriminatory practices in the
workplace might have dissipated or transmutated over the years, unequal pay has
not.
Fair Pay Act of 2013:
Introduced on Jan 29, 2013 in the 113th Congress, 2013–2015. Status: Died in a
previous Congress and was not enacted. The Act sought to end wage discrimination
against those who work in female- or minority-dominated jobs by establishing
equal pay for equivalent work; it would have prohibited wage discrimination
based on sex, race, or national origin. The Fair Pay Act made exceptions
for different wages based on seniority, merit, or quantity/quality of work and
contains an exemption for small businesses.
The gender pay gap
affects all women, though it has never affected all women equally.
According to a study that compared cross-racial/ethnic gender pay differentials
in 2012, the median weekly earnings of women of all racial/ethnic groups were
less than that of their male counterparts: 12% less among Hispanic or Latino/a,
10% less among African Americans, 19% less among Whites, and 27% less among
Asian Americans. The median weekly wages of white men are higher than all
others, as can be seen in this chart.
Brava to Patricia Arquette for raising awareness about this
issue during the Academy Awards! She had
the floor. It was her moment. She had just won the Oscar for Best Actress in a
Supporting Role and she was giving her acceptance speech. She had less than one
minute to thank her body of people but instead of focusing exclusively on her “Thank
You’s”, she put on her activist hat and brought up the issue of wage and gender
inequality. Here’s what she said:
“Jesus. Thank you to
the Academy, to my beautiful, powerful nominees to...[portion omitted]...my
heroes, volunteers and experts who help me bring ecological sanitation to the
developing world with Givelove.org.
To every woman who
gave birth, to every taxpayer and citizen of this nation, we have fought for
everybody else’s equal rights, it’s our time to have wage equality once and for
all, and equal rights for women in the United States of America.”
After she left the stage, later that evening she said to the
press, "Equal means equal. The
truth of it is the older an actress gets, the less money she makes. It’s
inexcusable that we talk about equal rights for women in other countries and
yet…we don’t have equal rights for women in America. It’s time for all the
women in America and all the men who love women and all the gay people and all
the people of color that we’ve fought for, to fight for us now.”
To those of you who criticized Patricia Arquette’s speech
and post-show comments, Shame On You!
She was not complaining about her life and she was not being
“anti-intersectional” [intersectionality
is a concept often used in critical theories to describe the ways in which
oppressive institutions (racism, sexism, homophobia, classism, etc.) are
interconnected and cannot be examined separately from one another]. This was not a keynote speech on feminism and
gender like the one Emma Watson presented at the U.N. headquarters in New York this
past September. Patricia Arquette earned
her public platform at the Oscars and she CHOSE to speak up on behalf of ALL
WOMEN, irrespective of color, sexual orientation, economic status, etc. And those of you who referred to her as a “wealthy
woman wearing an expensive designer gown” instead of a “crusader” and analyzed
her statements more deeply than a Shakespeare sonnet, shame on you even more! Come
on everyone...you know what she meant!
Yes, she read her speech from a scribbled note and her post-show
words may not have been as eloquent as they could have been but her message was
clear. In order to end wage and gender inequality, everyone needs to be
involved to make a change, including men, boys, women, girls, both genders! Patricia Arquette was not excluding or
critiquing anyone. She was simply asking all individuals in our country, particularly
those people who are part of groups who have likewise experienced inequality,
to fight for wage and gender equality.
We need to stop holding equal rights advocates to an
impossible standard of inclusiveness that is not applied to other social
movements. Society’s expectation that when a woman like Patricia Arquette speaks
about an issue of inequality that she herself has experienced, she must be speaking about the experience of
all women, puts these women in a double bind that would have us not speak out
at all.
Instead of tearing down women who raise awareness about
important issues, let’s add more voices and perspectives to the conversation.
Respectfully submitted,
Lidia Szczepanowski, Esq.
Everything Lidia, Incorporated
No comments:
Post a Comment